23 December 2009

Meals you're unlikely to have

From todays news : the man who killed and ate the last wild Indochinese tiger has been jailed for 12 years. Pleading self-defence while gathering clams in a wild-life reserve, the prosecutors argued 'you don't need a gun to gather clams'. The only known tiger in the reserve has not been seen since his dinner in 2007.

More info on the tiger itself here.

Genetics of tigers splits them into 6 distinct groups, well according to this paper anyway. Admittedly these are all subspecies, and whether we even care about that is a whole other question.
Another paper, which lists 5 subspecies, assigned captive tigers to the subspecies, finding a large proportion (52 of 105 examined) were of mixed origin (what would the BNP say). If you've got access to Science Direct it's available here.

This means that it is technically possible to continue 'pure-breeding' the subspecies, but whether it's worth it or not - who knows. Obviously they interbred quite happily, so the question becomes, do we want to enforce speciation on them, along with the corollary of (probably) reduced genetic diversity?

Me.

1 comment:

buzzandhum said...

We should encourage the keeping of tigers for pets. Because it won't take long before they're bred for every possible variation, colour scheme, size and temprament; like domestic cats and dogs are now.

Of course, there's also a high chance of numerous fatalities and stray tigers roaming the city streets savaging people.

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing.