Interesting report this week demonstrating that most published diet plans are a load of tosh. See here. Basically it appears the models of the NHS and the US NIH are flawed, they assume if you cut 500 calories, you'll lose 450gm a week. I've argued in the past that has to be flawed, weight loss (and gain), no matter how rigidly one sticks to the regime, is not a constant procedure - there are peaks, troughs, and plateau's.
I suspect most people wouldn't believe these numbers anyway.
If they did, then the impact of believing in the numbers would lead to depression as weight doesn't disappear as expected. Things start off well as the first 5-10kg is largely water, after that it's all nasty.
What redeems the diets is that the main focus is changing behaviour, which can lead to a useful feedback mechanism.
* change food types you eat
* change quantity of food
* change exercise regime
That strikes me as being a more useful focus of the plans, the weightloss can take care of itself. Kinda.
yeah im just blathering. whisky post should be here in the next day or two since the cabal covened last night.
28 February 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Your blog entries are outstanding. Thx
Post a Comment